All three methods do the same job: They try to predict which category (class) something belongs to. Like predicting if a stock will go "Up" or "Down".
The difference? How they draw the line between categories.
Logistic Regression draws a straight line (or flat surface in multiple dimensions) to separate your two groups. It directly calculates the probability that something belongs to one class or the other.
Imagine sorting apples and oranges on a table. Logistic regression draws a straight line down the middle: "Everything on the left is an apple, everything on the right is an orange." It doesn't care about the shape of the fruit pile, just finds the best straight line.
✅ When you don't want to make assumptions about your data
✅ When you have lots of data
✅ When a straight boundary makes sense
✅ Default choice - it's simple and robust!
LDA also draws a straight line, but it does it differently. It first looks at each group separately, figures out the "center" and "spread" of each group, then draws the line in between. It assumes both groups have the same shape/spread.
Imagine two clouds of balloons - red and blue. LDA says: "Let me find the center of each balloon cloud, see how spread out they are (and they spread the same way), then draw a line right between them." It's like finding the midpoint between two equally-sized groups.
✅ When your data looks roughly bell-shaped (normal distribution)
✅ When both groups have similar spread/variance
✅ When you have smaller datasets
✅ When you believe your groups are naturally Gaussian
QDA is like LDA but more flexible - it draws a curved line instead of straight. It allows each group to have its own unique shape and spread. This makes it more flexible but also means it needs more data to work well.
Back to our balloon clouds - but now the red balloons are tightly packed while the blue balloons are spread out widely. QDA says: "These groups have different shapes, so I'll draw a curved boundary that fits around them better." It's like wrapping a flexible rope around oddly-shaped groups.
✅ When your groups have very different spreads/shapes
✅ When the boundary between groups is clearly curved
✅ When you have LOTS of data (it needs more data than LDA)
✅ When a straight line just doesn't fit well
Logistic: Straight line
LDA: Straight line
QDA: Curved line
Logistic: None!
LDA: Same spread
QDA: Different spreads OK
Logistic: Medium
LDA: Less
QDA: Most
Logistic: Default choice
LDA: Small data, bell curves
QDA: Different group shapes
Start with Logistic Regression - it's simple and works well most of the time!
Try LDA if you have small data and think your groups are normally distributed.
Try QDA if you have lots of data and see that groups have very different shapes.